Murma174
Administrator
BeoarbaidjeMoin, du koast hier jädden Administrator wäide, man bloot do 'Bürokroaten' konnen dät moakje. Wie häbe hier neen Bürokroaten moor. Dät is fonsäärm n Probleem. Kening Aldgilles (Diskussion) 09:28, 5. Jul 2022 (UTC)
- @ Kening Aldgilles Ja, ik witj nooch, det maage a 'stewards' üüb det sidj: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Permissions . Man jo brük en positiif ufstemang üüb det lokaal wiki: https://stq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Weerskup#Admin . An ik san ei seeker, of diar tau positiif stemen ling. Normoolerwiis skel diar tumanst fiiw stemen wees, tumanst 80% positiif. Ik wal noch ans en streibriaf tu min frinjer üüb frrwiki skriiw. Iarst ans föl soonk! --Murma174 (Diskussion) 10:00, 5. Jul 2022 (UTC)
Memo
BeoarbaidjeKategorie:Candidates for speedy deletion Murma174 (Diskussion) 20:19, 10. Jul 2022 (UTC)
Test
BeoarbaidjeNeed your input on a policy impacting gadgets and UserJS
BeoarbaidjeDear interface administrator,
This is Samuel from the Security team and I hope my message finds you well.
There is an ongoing discussion on a proposed policy governing the use of external resources in gadgets and UserJS. The proposed Third-party resources policy aims at making the UserJS and Gadgets landscape a bit safer by encouraging best practices around external resources. After an initial non-public conversation with a small number of interface admins and staff, we've launched a much larger, public consultation to get a wider pool of feedback for improving the policy proposal. Based on the ideas received so far, the proposed policy now includes some of the risks related to user scripts and gadgets loading third-party resources, best practices for gadgets and UserJS developers, and exemptions requirements such as code transparency and inspectability.
As an interface administrator, your feedback and suggestions are warmly welcome until July 17, 2023 on the policy talk page.
Have a great day!Samuel (WMF), on behalf of the Foundation's Security team 23:02, 7. Jul 2023 (UTC)